BNS, BNSS, BSA — what actually changed for the practising advocate
The 2023 criminal-law overhaul is here. Past the headlines: the five provisions that will show up in your drafts this quarter.
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam came into force on 1 July 2024, replacing the IPC, CrPC, and Evidence Act. A lot has been written about the symbolism. This piece is about the paperwork.
The five provisions you'll touch this quarter
- Bail under BNSS §§ 478–482 — the procedural change around default bail timelines and e-FIR registration.
- Sanction for prosecution — § 218 BNSS, narrower windows for investigating-officer sanction.
- Summary trial expansion under BNSS § 283 — more cases now eligible, fewer excuses for delay.
- Organised-crime offences — BNS §§ 111 and 112, note the distinction between 'organised crime' and 'petty organised crime'.
- Electronic evidence — BSA §§ 61–65, admissibility of electronic records tightened.
What this means for your drafts
Straight edits first. Every section reference in your standard pleadings needs auditing. CrPC § 436A is now BNSS § 479. § 482 CrPC quashing petitions are now § 528 BNSS. These are mechanical changes — but mechanical changes cost you if you send out a notice dated 2025 with 2019 citations.
Bail applications
The default-bail framework (old CrPC § 167(2)) survives but has moved to BNSS § 187. The practical change that matters is the explicit recognition of electronic supplementary chargesheets, which compresses the timeline the accused has to act on. Read alongside the recent SC decision in Ritu Chhabria (which survived the transition), your bail drafting needs to front-load the period-of-detention math earlier in the application.
Summons and service
Electronic service is now express under BNSS § 64. This is useful — and also a trap. Clients will assume e-service alone is enough; it rarely is. Your process-service clause should now name the electronic mode and a physical mode, and your reply should contest any e-service that lacked acknowledgement.
BSA: electronic evidence, carefully
The BSA preserves the thrust of old § 65B but tightens authentication. If you deal with WhatsApp screenshots, call records, or CCTV, the certification procedure under BSA § 63 is now your gatekeeper. Senior Advocates are already losing matters because junior-drafted certificates are non-compliant.
Know the old sections. Know the new sections. For the next two years, know the mapping — and cite both in brackets so the bench doesn't have to.— A Delhi HC practitioner, February 2026
The transition in court
Different benches are handling the transition differently. Some insist on new citations only; others want both. Our empanelled advocates are currently drafting with the new cite primary and the old cite in parenthesis — it reads clean and spares the judge the cognitive tax.